neat blue dog

Joined

• started 367 topics
• posted 2,360 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by neat blue dog

• 
  30

  Simon: What happens when you can no longer support this site?

  by StephaneLaliberte in

  1. forum
  2. suggestions

  hey simon, .

  the recent closure of jwr made me realize that this site may not be eternal as well.

  a great deal of people attach a lot of importance to xjw communities and yours is the best.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  neat blue dog

  Not sure if this was mentioned already, but every page should be backed up on archive.org wayback machine already anyway. Heck, you can even go see old pages from jw.org and the sites that preceded it, jw-media.org and watchtower.org
• 
  10

  New songs unexpectedly released . . .

  by neat blue dog in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  earlier this year it was announced to all congregations that the new silver songbook would ultimately be made of 150 songs, (matching the number of psalms in the bible).

  however, they've apparently changed there minds in the last few months, because songs 152-154 were just posted to both jw-org and jw broadcasting.. https://www.jw.org/en/whats-new/.

  https://tv.jw.org.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  neat blue dog

  R.E.M. - Stand??

  To me its more like Weird Al's Spam.
• 
  10

  New songs unexpectedly released . . .

  by neat blue dog in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  earlier this year it was announced to all congregations that the new silver songbook would ultimately be made of 150 songs, (matching the number of psalms in the bible).

  however, they've apparently changed there minds in the last few months, because songs 152-154 were just posted to both jw-org and jw broadcasting.. https://www.jw.org/en/whats-new/.

  https://tv.jw.org.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  neat blue dog

  Earlier this year it was announced to all congregations that the new silver songbook would ultimately be made of 150 songs, (matching the number of Psalms in the Bible). However, they've apparently changed there minds in the last few months, because songs 152-154 were just posted to both jw-org and jw broadcasting.

  https://www.jw.org/en/whats-new/

  https://tv.jw.org

  Did you notice that there is no song 151 to be seen? It jumps from 150 to 152. I wonder if they're going to backpeddle now on releasing that deluxe silver softcover prototype they showed at the annual meeting, or if they'll even limit the number of songs in the revised songbook now . . .
• 
  18

  Scary Dream

  by freemamaof3 in

  1. jw
  2. experiences

  a little background- i faded in august 2015. ive got to small kids and one on the way.

  i dont believe the jw cult nonsense anymore.. .

  ok so last night i had the scariest dream.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  neat blue dog

  I had the usual Armageddon nightmares as a child, but nothing like this.
• 
  13

  Old Letter to the Governing Body

  by WITNESS-FOR-WATCHTOWER-REFORM in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  this is an older letter i wrote to the gb in october last year in regards to their policy around shunning of dissociated ones.

  the letter doesn't focus on the disfellowshiped, but am in the process right now of writing to them regarding their recent watchtower on shunning disfellowshipped relatives.. the letter i wrote back in october rambles on a bit, but wanted to express my frustration to the governing body about their very unfair policy toward those who simply choose to leave.. regards.

  the governing body.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  neat blue dog

  Oh but it did produce results. They used his line of reasoning regarding the 'anyone called a brother' scripture at this year's convention, and you can read it in the leaked outline. So thanks to this letter, they are now cracking down harder on faders.

  But keep in mind what is said at 1 Corinthians 5:9-13 ‘But now I am writing YOU to quit mixing in company with anyone called a brother that is a fornicator or a greedy person or an idolater or a reviler or a drunkard or an extortioner, not even eating with such a man’. As far as I am concerned, my rule book is Gods word. Therefore I am following scripture to avoid association with this man (called a brother) regardless of whether he has been disfellowshipped or not by the congregation because that is proper and right.
• 
  98

  Beards - September 2016 Watchtower

  by Listener in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  the issue of whether beards are acceptable or not is addressed in the september 2016 watchtower - well sort of.

  it is as clear as mud as to whether they are allowed in places like australia, usa and britain.. 17. what are some factors that may affect whether a brother wears a beard?17 what about the propriety of brothers wearing a beard?

  the mosaic law required men to wear a beard.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  neat blue dog

  What--if any--differences or distinctions are there between:
  the CUSTOMS of men
  and the TRADITIONS of men?

  Amen.
• 
  98

  Beards - September 2016 Watchtower

  by Listener in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  the issue of whether beards are acceptable or not is addressed in the september 2016 watchtower - well sort of.

  it is as clear as mud as to whether they are allowed in places like australia, usa and britain.. 17. what are some factors that may affect whether a brother wears a beard?17 what about the propriety of brothers wearing a beard?

  the mosaic law required men to wear a beard.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  neat blue dog

  I would not at all be surprised if this paragraph stirs up a wave of beard-wearing JWs, each interpreting cultural norms their own way.

  Yes, I do believe this is the beginning of the end for the beard ban. All it takes is for one congregations body of elders to decide beards are fine locally, (and these already exist in the US, albeit rarely), and the floodgates will open after that. Within 10 years we may even have a bearded JW used for illustrations in the publications.
  
  
• 
  98

  Beards - September 2016 Watchtower

  by Listener in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  the issue of whether beards are acceptable or not is addressed in the september 2016 watchtower - well sort of.

  it is as clear as mud as to whether they are allowed in places like australia, usa and britain.. 17. what are some factors that may affect whether a brother wears a beard?17 what about the propriety of brothers wearing a beard?

  the mosaic law required men to wear a beard.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  neat blue dog

  When presented with the fact that beards are viewed as respectable in our society, including ministers and businessmen, I've heard some witnesses retort, 'well, when was the last time a president of the united states had a beard?'

  So, if presidents are our standard now instead of businessmen, that means that pantsuits should now be allowed (like Hillary Clinton)
• 
  14

  HTTPS (SSL security) Now Available

  by Simon in

  1. forum
  2. announcements

  i've setup an ssl certificate so you can now use https to browse the site.

  this creates an encrypted connection between your browser and the server which is more secure and prevents urls visited from being shown in router logs, content can't be eavesdropped etc.... there are also some performance benefits but they won't kick in until i make some more changes.. consider it experimental for now but at some point it will likely automatically redirect you to the secure version of a page.. you can try it by adding 's' to the http part of any address or just goto the home page and browse from there (some mixed content means you may not get the fully green https status in your browser just yet though).. let me know if you have any issues using the site..

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  neat blue dog

  Wait . . . can they see where I've been on kingdom hall WiFi? 😱
• 
  11

  Bearded Danish Elder: WORLDS APART

  by compound complex in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  do you remember our interest a few years back in the film, worlds apart?.

  http://www.imdb.com/media/rm2245498624/tt1065318?ref_=tt_ov_i.

  coco.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  neat blue dog

  And I like underarm hair and leg hair on women.

  Seriously, I don't get the 'ewww' factor some have with it. It's natural and it's supposed to be there and that's just fine.